The podcast craze of the past several years shows no signs of slowing down, and while every armchair broadcaster with a voice recorder app is eager to get in the game. Tell me about the issue and Ill help you find the solution you need. Many typographers and other text enthusiasts Ive met insist that words are recognized by the outline made around the word shape. Some have used the term bouma as a synonym for word shape, though I was unfamiliar with the term. The term bouma appears in Paul Saengers 1. Space Between Words The Origins of Silent Reading. There I learned to my chagrin that we recognize words from their word shape and that Modern psychologists call this image the Bouma shape. This paper is written from the perspective of a reading psychologist. The data from dozens. This paper was originally presented as a talk at the ATyp. I conference in Vancouver in September, 2. The goal of this paper is to review the history of why psychologists moved from a word shape model of word recognition to a letter recognition model, and to help others to come to the same conclusion. This paper will cover many topics in relatively few pages. Along the way I will present experiments and models that I couldnt hope to cover completely without boring the reader. The National Radio Quiet Zone NRQZ is a 13,000squaremile area in West Virginia, Virginia, and part of Maryland that heavily restricts radio transmissions and. This list has no precise inclusion criteria as described in the Manual of Style for standalone lists. Please improve this article by adding inclusion criteria. Discuss. Executive Summary. Microsoft Partner Network Windows Live Id Sign. This Quick Reference Guide is intended to provide information to assist government in making informed decisions about section 508 related. If you want more details on an experiment, all of the references are at the end of the paper as well as suggested readings for those interested in more information on some topics. Most papers are widely available at academic libraries. I will start by describing three major categories of word recognition models the word shape model, and serial and parallel models of letter recognition. I will present representative data that was used as evidence to support each model. After all the evidence has been presented, I will evaluate the models in terms of their ability to support the data. And finally I will describe some recent developments in word recognition and a more detailed model that is currently popular among psychologists. The word recognition model that says words are recognized as complete units is the oldest model in the psychological literature, and is likely much older than the psychological literature. P2iPqKH1' alt='Window Eyes 7 0 Screen Reader With No Activation' title='Window Eyes 7 0 Screen Reader With No Activation' />The general idea is that we see words as a complete patterns rather than the sum of letter parts. Some claim that the information used to recognize a word is the pattern of ascending, descending, and neutral characters. Another formulation is to use the envelope created by the outline of the word. The word patterns are recognizable to us as an image because we have seen each of the patterns many times before. James Cattell 1. Cattell is recognized as an influential founder of the field of psycholinguistics, which includes the scientific study of reading. Figure 1. Word shape recognition using the pattern of ascending, descending, and. Figure 2. Word shape recognition using the envelope around the word. Cattell supported the word shape model because it provided the best explanation of the available experimental evidence. Cattell had discovered a fascinating effect that today we call the Word Superiority Effect. He presented letter and word stimuli to subjects for a very brief period of time 5 1. He concluded that subjects were more accurate at recognizing words in a short period of time because whole words are the units that we recognize. Cattells study was. Reicher. He presented strings of letters half the time real words, half the time not for brief periods. The. subjects were asked if one of two letters were contained in the string, for. Reicher found that subjects were more accurate at recognizing D when it was in the context of WORD. ORWD. This supports the word shape model because the word allows the subject to. Once the shape has been recognized. The second key piece of. Woodworth 1. 93. Experimental Psychology. This finding has been confirmed more recently by Smith 1. Fisher. 1. 97. 5. Participants were asked to read comparable passages of text, half. In each study, participants read reliably faster with the lowercase text by a. This supports the word shape model because lowercase. When text is presented in all uppercase, all letters have. The patterns of errors that are missed while proofreading text provide. Subjects were asked to carefully read passages of text. The passage had been carefully designed to have. A misspelling that is consistent with word shape is one that contains the same patterns of ascenders, descenders, and. If test is the correctly spelled word, tesf. The word. shape model would predict that consistent word shapes would be caught less. Haber Schindler 1. Monk Hulme 1. Target word test. Error rate. Consistent word shape. Inconsistent word. Figure 3. Misspellings that are consistent with word shape are missed more often. The fourth piece of evidence supporting the word shape model is that it is difficult. Al. Te. Rn. At. In. G case is where the letters of a word change from uppercase to lowercase multiple times. The word shape model predicts that this is difficult because it gives a pattern of ascending, descending, and neutral. Alternating case has been shown to be more. Smith 1. 96. 9 showed that it slowed the reading speed of a passage. Mason 1. 97. 8 showed that the time to name a word was slowed. Pollatsek, Well, Schindler 1. Meyer Gutschera 1. The shortest lived model of word recognition is that words are read letter by letter. Gough 1. 97. 2 proposed this model because it was easy to understand, and far more testable than the word shape. In essence, recognizing a word in the mental lexicon was analogous to looking up a word in a dictionary. You start off. by finding the first letter, than the second, and so on until you recognize the word. This model is consistent with Sperlings 1. Sperling showed participants strings of random letters for brief periods of time, asking if a particular. He found that if participants were given 1. For example, if the target letter was in the fourth position and the string was presented for 3. Gough noted that a rate of 1. The serial letter recognition model is also able to successfully predict that shorter. It is a very robust finding that word recognition takes more time with longer words. It takes more time to recognize a 5 letter word than a 4 letter word, and 6 letter words take more time to recognize than 5 letter words. The serial letter recognition model predicts that this should happen, while a word shape model does not make this prediction. In fact. the word shape model should expect longer words with more unique patterns to be easier to recognize than shorter words. The serial letter recognition model fails because it cannot explain the Word Superiority. Effect. The Word Superiority Effect showed that readers are better able to identify letters in the context of a word than in isolation. The model that most psychologists currently accept as most accurate is the parallel. This model says that the letters within a word are recognized simultaneously, and the letter information is used. This is a very active area of research and there are many specific models that fit into this general category. I will only discuss one popular formulation of this model. Figure 4 shows a generic activation based parallel letter recognition model. In this example, the reader is seeing the word work. Each of the stimulus letters are processed simultaneously. The first step of processing is recognizing the features. Muzzle Automatically Disables OS X Notifications When You Screen Share. When youre sharing your screen for a business or school presentation, you dont want any notifications popping up, like a sext, a calendar notification for your therapist appointment, or a Slack DM about the problem client youre currently presenting to. You could hit Do Not Disturb, but what if you forget While Windows 1. OS X doesnt. The free app Muzzle fixes that. Muzzle mutes notifications while you screen share with Slack, Google Hangouts, join. Skype. It sits quietly in your menu bar and uses zero memory when youre not screen sharing, says its developer Bryan D K Jones. As depicted above, the apps download page displays an endless array of humiliating notifications you might want to avoid. If Joness fake notifications are funny to you, keep an eye out for the prank app he says hes working on, which will deliver them to your actual desktop. By the way, the apps tiny interface includes a goofy button labeled Mach Override. Go ahead and push it it doesnt actually do anything. Which seems like a foolhardy joke to make in an anti embarrassment app, so were warning you here.